According to a news article published by FoxNews.com, a New
Jersey mother has accused her local elementary school, in Galloway Township,
N.J., of bullying her 10 year old son. The mother claims that the school
personnel has “repeatedly taken her child’s lunch and thrown it away.” The mother acknowledges that her son’s lunch account had “become delinquent”
due to unpaid cafeteria balances, however, the mother attributes the situation on her
son’s “occasional failure to relay notes and messages on the issue.” According
to the article, the child suffers from Asperger’s Syndrome. Recently, a similar incident occurred at Uintah
Elementary School in Salt Lake City, Utah. According to the article school
officials in Uintah Elementary School “replaced […] student’s $2 lunches with
fruit and milk […] because of insufficient or negative balances.” The father of
an 11 year old student whose lunch was taken away by Uintah school officials
believes that “young children [should not] be punished or humiliated for
something the parents […] need to clear up.” Similarly, the N.J. mother
expressed her belief that the issue should remain “between the parents and the
cafeteria […not] between the child and the lunch lady.”
This article reveals how arbitrary
the definition of bullying can be. Some people would argue that school
officials have no right to deprive children of their school lunches and in the
process humiliate them. However, other individuals would argue that “rules are
rules”, and as a result, school officials have the right to deny and deprive
students of their school lunches if their parents fail to pay the school
lunch balances. In my opinion this scenario is an excellent example of a bullying
scenario that contradicts a common assumption. Usually school officials are
thought as having students’ best interests in mind. However, this article is
proof that the aforementioned assumption is not always the case. Is it really
in the students’ best interests to deprive them of their school lunches over
fees their parents have failed to pay? What lesson are students supposed to
learn, pay or be humiliated?
No comments:
Post a Comment