Showing posts with label bullying relations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bullying relations. Show all posts

Sunday, March 16, 2014

A Realistic Perspective of Bullying



On this occasion I will begin my analysis of an academic journal titled “Bullying in School: An Overview of Types, Effects, Family Characteristics, and Intervention Strategies” which was written by Paul R. Smokowski and Kelly Holland Kopasz. According to the journal, “one in three children” is affected by bullying within U.S. schools. However, the journal notes that the National School Safety Center has “called bullying the most enduring and underrated problem in U.S. Schools.” In fact, a recent national survey found that “nearly 30% of the students surveyed reported being involved in bullying […] as either a perpetrator or a victim.” In reality the aforementioned statistic translates to approximately “3,708,284 students reporting bullying and 3,245,904 students reporting victimization.”   
Before reading this article it was really hard to put into perspective and visualize the different bullying percentages given by different resources. However, now that a physical number has been given it is hard to understand why the problem is being overlooked. As mentioned within this article, bullying is “underrated.” As a result, perhaps anti-bullying strategies should focus on helping parents and other adults identify bullying. The problem of bullying cannot be addressed if it is not first identified and accepted as an existing problem.
The journal notes that a power imbalance is a feature typically found within bullying relationships, with “the bully being either physically or psychologically more powerful [than the victim].” The journal states that bullies may use bullying as “a means to establish dominance or maintain status.” Although the journal provides various examples of bullying including, name calling, physical assault, threatening, stealing, vandalizing, slandering, excluding and taunting, the journal notes that “regardless of which behavior is chose, bullying is marked by intense intimidation that creates a pattern of humiliation, abuse, and fear for the victim.”
In my opinion, the struggle for power is not the problem. Competitiveness is what has driven humanity to progress and improve. The problem begins when the struggle for power gets out of hand. When the power struggles transforms into bullying, healthy competitiveness stops and a unproductive monopoly begins. As a result, just as forming and maintaining a monopoly is illegal, so should maintaining a bullying relationship. This does not mean that all incidents of bullying should be treated as heinous crimes, but rather that each bullying case should be treated seriously and be responded to independently according to its own circumstances.

Friday, February 7, 2014

Defining Individuals According to Bullying




           In the previous blog I discussed some statistics regarding bullies and bully victims. However, I noticed that the academic journal article “The causes and nature of bullying and social exclusion in schools” by Maria el Mar Badia Martin uses peculiar classifications for various degrees of bully involvement. As a result, in order to clarify the statistics found within the previous blog, I will discuss the different types of individuals that exist according to Badia Martin’s academic journal article.
           According to Badia Martin individuals can be classified as the following:
1)      Bullies – These are individuals who are frequently involved in bullying others, but are never or rarely victimized.
2)      Victims – These are individuals who are frequently victimized, but who never or rarely bully others.
3)      Bully/Victims – These are individuals who frequently bully others and become victims of bullying.
4)      Neutrals – These are individuals who neither bully others, nor become victims of bullying themselves.
As can be seen, the definitions that exist regarding individuals and their relationship to bullying are rather intricate. It is interesting to note the varying degrees of involvement a single person can assume within the realm of bullying, from having absolutely no involvement, to being both "the bully" and "the bullied". The definition of the bully/victim is extremely interesting, because a single person assumes the position of the “perpetrator” and “victim” of bullying. Perhaps, the bullying behavior exhibited by the bully/victim is a form of retaliation for bullying done onto them. If this is true, it might explain one mechanism of how bullying perpetuates into a seemingly endless cycle.